Make a blog


1 year ago

Do You Have A Netlife?

Therefore is six degrees of separation - the hypothesis that anybody on Earth could be linked to any with no more than five intermediaries.

The hypothesis was initially proposed in 1929 by the author Karinthy Frigyes in a short story called Chains. The hypothesis is founded on the idea that the number of colleagues increases exponentially with the number of links in the sequence,...

On the web social support systems - whether personal or business are constantly in the news today.

Therefore is six degrees of separation - the theory that everyone in The World may be linked to any with no more than five intermediaries.

The theory was proposed in 1929 by the Hungarian author Karinthy Frigyes in a brief story called Chains. The theory is founded on the proven fact that the number of acquaintances grows exponentially with the number of links in the sequence, and so only a small number of links is necessary for the group of acquaintances to become the whole adult population.

It gained credence after the 1967 small world test by social psychologist Stanley Milgram which suggested that two arbitrary US citizens were certainly linked normally by a series of six friends. I discovered by browsing the Internet. Milgram also discovered a 'funnelling' effect when a lot of the connecting was being done by a tiny amount of 'stars' with considerably higher-than-average connection.

Social network theory views social relationships with regards to nodes and connections. Nodes are the people within the net-works, and ties are the relationships between them. According to research performed by Russell Hill (University of Durham) and Robin Dunbar (University of Liverpool) social network size in modern Western society, based on the exchange of Christmas cards, is averaged a maximum of 153.5 with a mean network size of 124.9.

In business it is estimated the average 'director' is aware of 250 business people who consequently know still another 250 business people. This implies that for each new person you meet, you get access to a potential pool of 62,500 people separated from you by only two levels and this seems to be carried out by the figures for long run users of areas like LinkedIn.

Social network theory suggests that personal success may be based on your network and that the form of the social network helps establish a network's performance to its people. Smaller, stronger networks tend to be less helpful to their members than networks with lots of loose connections as 'more open' networks are more prone to introduce new ideas and opportunities for their members than closed networks with many repetitive connections.

In other words, a small grouping of friends who only do things with each other already share the exact same knowledge and possibilities. On-the other hand people with many connections are more likely to have use of a broader range of data and more likely to be (materially) successful.

According to Thomas Power, the Chairman of Ecademy: 'the value of nodes (close contacts) is that they lead you to links (distant contacts). The money, your money, exists in the contacts not the close contacts. Very few people I meet recognize this fact and continue to concentrate on their close associates for cash. That is wrong. Close contacts for information, remote contacts for money is the rule.'

Today social networks combined with technology improvements are quickly becoming a new CRM tool for entrepreneurs. We found out about by searching Google.

Search-engines find information and data, but people offer answers to dilemmas. Networks can solve problems for people and o-nline sites accelerate and globalize the procedure. Everyone in a system has at least one area of expertise and provides solutions when questions arise relevant to their area of expertise. All of us understand that getting the right answer quickly isn't easy. but when your network includeshundreds of individuals who will answer questions within the network, your power to get questions answered quickly multiplies exponentially.